ERD Delivering Effective Remediation to Indiana Drycleaner Site

ERD injectionsEnviroForensics is excited to report yet another Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination (ERD) success story. Our staff has been employing this technique for more than a decade at sites across the state and the Midwest, and it has, once again, delivered the desired effect to an impacted drycleaning property in Lafayette, Indiana.

Contamination consisting of the chlorinated solvent, PCE, was discovered in the subsurface at the Vogue Cleaners property, in an interbedded sand and clay formation. Per the Remedial Work Plan approved by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), we conducted an excavation on the side of the building, digging as deep as 21-feet below ground level to remove impacted soil.

In order to address groundwater impacts, we used an ERD application augmented with zero-valent iron (ZVI – an in-situ chemical reduction [ISCR] agent) to address those problem areas.  Naturally occurring bacteria called dehalococcoides (DHC) were present in the groundwater onsite and in the area of the property. As we’ve explained in past blogs, these microorganisms naturally break down chlorinated solvents by cleaving off chlorine molecules and replacing them with hydrogen particles. In order to maximize the use of these microorganisms, we injected a substrate called Lecithin mixed with ZVI ®, developed by Peroxychem, as the carbon source. Additionally, a substrate called Provect IR (produced by Provectus), which also had ZVI as an ISCR agent, was used in a different part of the site because it was determined to be more effective for the subsurface conditions found in that area.

The addition of the substrates immediately began the reduction of the PCE concentrations followed by sustained contaminant destruction over time.  The first round of ERD injections proved to be very successful. PCE concentrations, which in some spots were as high as 4,000 micrograms per liter, were knocked down to less than laboratory detection limits. These results show the typical success of ERD technologies when implemented by experienced professionals.  The remediation at the site has progressed quickly and effectively, and closure procedures are now being discussed with IDEM.  With this effective and efficient remediation we anticipate our client will receive a “covenant not to sue” from the State of Indiana shortly after site closure.

EnviroForensics Attending MWDLA Annual Convention This Weekend

It’s been a whirlwind couple of days at EnviroForensics. In the midst of the major move from our current headquarters to our new one, we’re also getting ready for one of the biggest weekends of the year, the annual Midwest Drycleaning and Laundry Association Convention!!

Over the next two days, dozens omidwestdrycleaningf drycleaners from Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio will converge on the Belterra Casino Resort and Spa in Florence, Indiana, to talk about new technologies and emerging challenges in the industry. But, of course it won’t just be strictly for business.

We’re excited to meet up with our partners and friends in the industry who have played a major role in our 20 year existence. Environmental consulting is very much, at its core, a people business. We’re brought in to clean up contamination that can threaten human health, but we’re also there to provide a safety net to the business owner, who likely never knew of the potential for pollution.

Some of these drycleaners have been our clients, but we also consider them our friends. This weekend we’ll be hitting the golf course with them, catching up over a few drinks at happy hour, and talking shop while dining on some delicious food.  We take pride in our customer service, and it’s events like these that give us a better understanding of the drycleaner experience and help us cultivate a more personal connection with our clients. If you’re heading down to Florence today, we’ll see you there!

 

Eliminating Background Sources of Vapor Contamination at Active Dry Cleaners

Vapor intrusion continues to be one of the most common exposure pathways that we investigate in our work at EnviroForensics.  We’ve mentioned in past blogs that many household and commercial products can serve as background sources of contamination in indoor air, making it difficult to determine how much contamination is truly due to vapor intrusion from the subsurface.  The presence of background sources is likely to increase concentrations of contaminants in indoor air samples if they are not eliminated prior to sampling and this bias may misrepresent indoor air as it relates to vapor intrusion.  Therefore, elimination of background sources is necessary to obtain a true measurement of indoor air quality related to vapor intrusion.

But what about cleaning products and emissions at an active dry cleaning businesses?  Dry cleaning emissions are also considered a background source that can contribute to indoor air conditions, but removing them is not as easy as simply moving a bottle of cleaning supplies out of the building before samples are collected.  IDEM recently required indoor air sampling in each tenant space at a strip mall where one of our clients owns a coin operated laundromat and actively performs dry cleaning with PCE and TCE. The EnviroForensics team had to go the extra mile to make sure background sources were eliminated as best as possible before collecting the air samples.

After assessing the strip mall’s basic construction and configuration to gather information pertaining to air circulation, we determined that the best approach was to physically remove as many cleaning materials containing PCE or TCE as possible and then complete a fresh air exchange in each tenant space at least 48 hours before sampling.  We worked with our client to determine a period of time when his business could continue to operate but cease dry cleaning for approximately three (3) days.  Cleaning products that could easily be removed were taken out of the building, but materials were not drained from the dry cleaning machine and dry cleaned clothes were wrapped in plastic and left in place.

After coordinating with the other businesses in the strip mall, a fresh air exchange was conducted in each tenant space using a ventilation fan to draw air from inside the building to the outside, allowing fresh air to flow in.  When the air exchange was complete, the EnviroForensics team waited 48 hours before collecting indoor air samples inside each tenant space.  In doing so, the project team able to satisfy the IDEM requirement for vapor intrusion assessments, making sure that the samples collected were truly representative of vapor intrusion from subsurface conditions.

EnviroForensics continues to think outside the box to identify viable solutions that will minimize the burden on our client’s ability to run their business while addressing their environmental liabilities.

Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination Showing Positive Returns at Indiana Dry Cleaning Site

While the surrounding Mooresville, Indiana community applauds Crest Cleaners for proactively cleaning up a previously unidentified hazardous mess that was left behind from historic dry cleaning practices, the workhorses remediating the contamination are grinding away below the subsurface.  Tiny microorganisms are destroying the PCE in the groundwater and reducing the concentration of the contaminant. It’s all a part of the “Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination,” process, which is the primary approach of the Remedial Work Plan (RWP) being implemented by EnviroForensics.

Air quality test canister placed in adjacent to determine Vapor Intrusion impact.
Air quality test canisters placed in adjacent building to determine Vapor Intrusion impact.

In addition to the potential for human health risks at the Site as a result of soil or groundwater exposure, the contaminant plume in the groundwater represented a potential vapor intrusion risk to an offsite building.  The project team debated between two viable options:

1.      Install, monitor, and maintain a Sub-Slab Depressurization System (SSDS) at the offsite location to mitigate the potentially harmful vapors underneath the building, which would have required years of maintenance and groundwater sampling; or

2.      Implement an ERD application to reduce the concentration of the groundwater plume, and eliminate potential vapor intrusion issues.

Based on the overall benefit to the community and to reduce stress and aggravation to adjacent property owners that comes with long-term monitoring, the project team chose option two.

Fences being put up around one of the injection sites.
Fences being put up around one of the injection sites.

Here’s how the remediation at this site worked. Naturally occurring bacteria called Dehalococcoides ethanogenes (DHC) are in the groundwater completing a process called reductive dechlorination where the chlorine molecules are cleaved off and replaced by hydrogen particles.  This process continues until the resulting compound is no longer dangerous.   At this site, the process was occurring, but not at a rate that would make the cleanup cost effective for the client.  In order to complete this cleanup we utilized a process called bioaugmented enhanced reductive dechlorination (ERD) and in-situ chemical reduction (ISCR).  The process begins by sampling the groundwater across the remediation area for contaminant concentrations and geochemical parameters including DHC populations to determine the dosage of injected materials required in each area of the site.  Different areas received modified doses of materials based on the calculations completed by our geochemist.  The ERD agent (3D-Microemulsion or 3DMe) was injected along with Chemical Reducing Solution (CRS), an ISCR augmentation.  The ISCR agent immediately begins hydrolysis reactions directly destroying the PCE contaminant while producing reduction reactions with the natural chemistry that will allow the 3DMe to better complete its work.  The two work synergistically, increasing the cost effectiveness of the injection.  The pre-sampling of DHC revealed that the population of DHC needed to be augmented.  10 gallons of a DHC enhanced fluid was injected at each of the 92 injection locations used for the ERD/ISCR.   The combination of these three injected materials allows for minimal site disturbance and a high level of effectiveness for the cleanup of drycleaning solvents.

Intrinsically safe fan installed on building
Intrinsically-safe fan installed on building to manage potential methane production.

An often overlooked byproduct of the ERD process is methane. As a preventative measure, the field staff upgraded the Site building SSDS with an intrinsically-safe fan and installed an intrinsically-safe SSDS at the offsite building as an interim measure.  Soil gas points were also installed between the injection areas and the adjoining properties to the east.  Additionally, EnviroForensics has extra intrinsically-safe fans and piping ready to be installed, should there be a methane issue at the surrounding properties.

The results from the first injection event were very promising. Groundwater contaminant concentration went down from thousands of micrograms per liter before the injection to single digits of micrograms per liter one month after the injections. Quarterly groundwater sampling will continue for a year or two to demonstrate that the contaminant plume is retreating or remediated. The ultimate goal of the ERD approach is to reach Site closure quickly, and reduce the costs and health risks of this contamination.

 

Click here to learn more about how Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination works.

Soil Vapor Extraction Without all the Fuss

An environmental cleanup can be quite the undertaking, and at times, can get a little noisy. This could be troublesome if the job is in an already existing residential or business area. You don’t want to bother anyone, but you also have to clean up the hazardous chemical. Sometimes the best options for a Site remediation just don’t jibe with the surrounding area. That’s where EnviroForensics’ experience with custom remedial engineering comes into play.

A common method for pulling potentially harmful chemicals out of impacted soil is the implementation of a soil vapor extraction system (SVE). This specially designed contraption induces airflow through the pore spaces in the impacted soils, converting volatile contaminants into the vapor phase, and removing them from the soil.

Unfortunately, many “off-the-shelf” systems of this type are large, bulky, and loud, which mPic_SVE_Blogay cause complaints from nearby residents or interfere with business operations at the cleanup site.

EnviroForensics recently designed, assembled, and began operation of a custom SVE system (pictured above) at a site contaminated with tetrachloroethylene (PCE) from historical dry cleaning activities. The assignment was complex to say the least; the contamination had reached the sandstone bedrock, deep below ground surface (SVE systems aren’t normally used in bedrock applications), and the client needed a system that would be quiet, compact, and cost-effective.

EnviroForensics’ expert engineers rose to these challenges and designed a custom SVE system that not only fit within a small portion of an un-used garage in the client’s building, but also was quiet enough to hold casual conversations within feet of the operating blowers. The system is also fully automated, which allows for remote performance evaluation and adjustment without mobilizing to the Site, resulting in significant cost savings to the project.  The system built by EnviroForensics is robust yet adaptable, thereby allowing it to provide maximum contaminant removal within all portions of the variable subsurface geologic materials. The net result is an effective bedrock remediation system that is hardly noticeable to employees or the surrounding community. Within the weeks since the system was turned on, hundreds of pounds of PCE have been removed from the underlying bedrock. The regulators, the community, and our client are pleased.

California Perc Ban: 2023 Deadline Inching Closer

DRYCLEANING SOLVENT TO BE PHASED OUT IN NEXT TWO YEARS AND OTHER STATES CONSIDER BANS OF THEIR OWN 

California banned the installation of new Perc dry cleaning machines in 2007 and required that old machines be shut down by 2010. The law also stated that all Perc machines must be taken out of service by 2023. In 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approved California’s Perc ban. 

Perc has long been in use as an effective drycleaning solvent, and much environmental contamination from Perc is linked to historical drycleaning operations. In the 1970s and 80s industries that used chemicals for cleaning and degreasing didn’t realize that those chemicals could result in soil and groundwater contamination when spilled. It’s also worth noting that the EPA was not established until 1970, while dry cleaning started in the 1930s. 

Learn more about the history of Perc use in drycleaners. 

Currently, the EPA regulates Perc under the Clean Air Act. In compliance with the Clean Air Act, the EPA has developed standards for controlling Perc emissions. The EPA also conducts two reviews to monitor the implementation and success of these standards. Every eight years, they perform a technology review, which seeks improvements in air pollution controls and prevention. The EPA also conducts a residual risk review to assess human health effects after certain standards have been put into effect.

PERC BANS IN OTHER STATES
California is not the only state banning Perc from dry cleaning operations Minnesota lawmakers passed a ban in March 2021 to take full effect by 2026. New York State banned the use of Perc solvent in co-located residential facilities at the end of 2020 and will phase out the use of third generation drycleaning machines by the end of 2021.  

WHAT DRYCLEANERS SHOULD DO TO PREPARE FOR A POST-PERC WORLD
Drycleaners in all states should be considering this possibility and seeking measures to reduce or eliminate their own use of Perc in their operations. This possibility also makes now an ideal time for drycleaners to consider proactively addressing any potential contamination issues they may have—the first step of which is hiring an environmental consultant. EnviroForensics is perfectly equipped with a team of environmental professionals who possess the skill and expertise to investigate and remediate environmental contamination from the use of Perc in dry cleaning operations.  

Learn more about our environmental services for drycleaners and contact us today.

Contamination Cleanup—Without the Mess

Cleaning up contamination at the site of your business can be a daunting prospect. In addition to concerns about the associated costs, worries about how the cleanup process will affect your business also arise. Questions come up such as: “Can I remain open while cleanup is occurring?” “Will I lose customers?” “Will it affect my workers?”

EnviroForensics considers these top-level concerns as we conduct environmental investigations and remediation for our clients. We strive to create as little interference in our clients’ business operations as possible while we handle environmental contamination. There are several examples of clients we have assisted in this way.

A recent example is Mercury Cleaners, a dry cleaner client of ours in Valparaiso, Indiana that is undergoing a soil and groundwater contamination cleanup while remaining open. Norman, Linda and Brett Dygert, the owners of Mercury Cleaners, received a notice of liability from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) after testing discovered perchloroethylene (PERC) in the soil and groundwater on a nearby property. EnviroForensics was able to work with the Dygerts and IDEM to create a remediation plan that allows Mercury Cleaners to remain open while remediation occurs.  Active cleanup is underway without business interruptions.

Klinke Cleaners is another client of ours who was able to conduct normal business operations while we dealt with contamination on one of their properties. Our team drilled for soil samples, collected vapor samples, and installed a vapor mitigation system beneath the building without disrupting our client’s workers or customers. We successfully addressed contamination on the property and obtained a regulatory site closure for the dry cleaner, all while ensuring that our client was able to run their business as usual.

Yet another example is a client of ours who is the owner of a former manufacturing facility turned furniture showroom. Historical operations from past owners caused a release of chlorinated solvents in the soil and groundwater, which migrated to other properties. To protect our client’s newly renovated showroom, our staff isolated the work area while messy subsurface investigation processes were underway. Our staff made sure that all contaminated soils and water produced during the process were quickly gathered and carefully contained.

EnviroForensics understands that, as a business owner, it is important to you that your business remain viable while contamination issues are addressed. Although it may seem like the remediation process would be disruptive and harmful to your business, we make it our priority to keep you in business while fulfilling our promise to help you deal with environmental liabilities.

EnviroForensics Completes Investigation; Begins Remediation Stage of Former Evansville Dry Cleaner Project

photoWe are happy to report that another one of our projects has entered the beginning stages of remediation for one of our valued clients. EnviroForensics has been conducting an environmental investigation at the former Harvey Cleaners of Evansville, Indiana since due diligence efforts at a nearby property uncovered contamination coming from the former Harvey’s operations.  The owner of the former Harvey’s Cleaners has been working alongside the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), and EnviroForensics, to determine the breadth of the problem.

Subsurface investigation activities, initially requested by the IDEM in 2010, identified the release of hazardous materials to the subsurface at the site.  Additional site investigation activities were performed by EnviroForensics under the direction of IDEM, and the data revealed that the historic dry cleaning operations had impacted not only the soil, but also the groundwater beneath the building.  The assessment to determine the precise source and extents of the contamination was recently finalized, and a strategy to clean-up the site was put into action this month.

Soil excavation was selected as the primary remedial option to definitively and efficiently remediate the release of these chemicals to the soils, and will have a positive effect on the low level of groundwater impacts.  Demolition of the vacant building was determined to be a necessary step in order to gain access to the impacted soils beneath the building’s foundation. The demolition of the building began in earnest this week.  The remediation efforts are being funded using insurance assets of the former Harvey’s Cleaners and are being completed at no additional cost to the owner of the former business. This summer’s remedial action will ultimately lead to site being granted regulatory closure by the IDEM, which will then release the property for beneficial reuse.

When Environmental Cleanup is Good Community Relations

Faced with the possibility that decades-old dry cleaning solvent may have polluted ground under its original dry cleaning plant in Jeffersonville, Indiana, family-owned dry cleaning business Nu Yale Cleaners contracted EnviroForensics to investigate. Together, the two companies are proactively taking action for a safer, cleaner environment by removing perchloroethylene (PCE contamination), a dry-cleaning solvent they no longer use. And Nu Yale is happy to talk about it.

The Positive Side of Things

Believe it or not, even with all of the scariness and seriousness, cleaning up environmental contamination can be good community relations.  The key is understanding that there is a positive light to cleaning up environmental contamination and that it doesn’t have to hurt your reputation. Continue reading “When Environmental Cleanup is Good Community Relations”

What Triggers an Environmental Investigation?

Dry cleaners often live in a state of fear. Harsh chemicals used by these businesses can permeate the ground nearby, resulting in environmental problems that may lead to costly cleanup or litigation. Many business owners are in the dark when it comes to understanding what triggers an environmental investigation. For some, the best option is to simply look the other way.

What triggers an environmental investigation?

The most common triggering event is a requirement by a bank lending on the property. The property owner may want to refinance the property, or a prospective buyer of the property wants to obtain financing.

Other issues that can trigger environmental investigations include:

·         Contamination being discovered  in municipal or private drinking water wells

·         Contamination being discovered beneath neighboring or down gradient properties

·         Regional investigations conducted under the direction of state or federal regulatory agencies

How does this process begin?

When a bank evaluates whether or not to lend on a commercial property, they will require a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA). The Phase I ESA is a due diligence evaluation of the property to identify potential or existing environmental contamination liabilities. A Phase I ESA is conducted under guidelines established by ASTM International, an organization of engineers, scientists, and policymakers that set technical standards.

The consultant conducting the Phase I ESA will inspect the site for signs of staining, evidence of spills, stressed vegetation, determination of underground and above ground tanks, secondary containment, violations, and operating practices. They will evaluate records at the fire department, local health department, state environmental agencies, and federal EPA to determine whether fires or chemical spills were reported on the subject property or on neighboring properties. This review would also evaluate what businesses are operating in the vicinity that could cause environmental impacts that may impact the subject site.  The past operation of certain types of businesses, including dry cleaners, automatically increases the chance that further ground testing will be required prior to lending.

New guidance passed in 2013 puts greater emphasis on assessing the potential impacts from vapor intrusion and vapor migration on the property. The definition of an environmental concern within the guidance has been changed to include contamination in the subsurface vapor phase, in addition to the soil and groundwater.

The net result of this new guidance will be an increased focus on dry cleaners that used perchloroethylene (PERC).

What happens after the Phase I ESA?

Should the Phase I ESA identify a reasonable potential that soil and groundwater may be impacted, the consultant will suggest conducting a Phase II ESA. A Phase II ESA includes collection of subsurface samples to determine whether the property has been impacted with chemicals that pose a risk to human health or the environment.

What does this mean?

PERC is a common dry cleaning solvent, which is why focus is placed on dry cleaners. When PERC is found in the groundwater, the situation escalates rapidly.

The State of California, for example, found levels of PERC in municipal drinking water wells and immediately sought to identify all dry cleaners that operated within a mile radius of the well for the previous 50 years.  By using historical records, the address, name, and period of time a dry cleaner operated at a location can be identified.

If PERC, or any other contaminant is found in soil or groundwater during a Phase II ESA, the release is required to be reported to the state environmental agency.  Subsequent investigations and, ultimately, remediation activities, are then required to be performed with oversight by the agency.

The term “release” will now also include identified impacts in the vapor phase (i.e. soil gas). The need to assess the subsurface vapor phase (soil gas phase) will likely result in increased sampling, which could lead to an increase in dry cleaner sites identified as potentially having releases from their operations.

What can you do?

All dry cleaners must understand how investigations are triggered and what to expect after, which is why locating the old commercial general liability (CGL) insurance policies is vital. Old CGL policies written before 1985 or 1986 don’t include absolute pollution exclusion language and can be used to defend the insured against contamination claims.

EnviroForensics is highly regarded for our expertise in chlorinated solvent contamination and vapor intrusion (VI) issues. If VI is a concern for your property, we encourage you to learn more.

To find out additional information about environmental remediation triggers and steps you can take to protect your business, contact us today.


EnviroForensics® is an environmental engineering firm specializing in soil and groundwater investigation and remediation and vapor intrusion assessment and mitigation. EnviroForensics® has all the tools available to us to perform the highest caliber science in the market today, which allows designing and implementing knowledgeable, innovative and effective solutions to PCE and TCE contamination. EnviroForensics® has pioneered and perfected the utilization of Commercial General Liability insurance policies as a resource to pay for the high costs associated with soil and groundwater investigations, remediation, and legal defense.